- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
- Effect of family-centered interventions for perinatal depression: an overview of systematic reviews
| Ref ID | 1019 |
| First Author | L. He |
| Journal | FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094360/full |
| Keywords |
Mental health Risk of bias Low methodological quality |
| Problem(s) |
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed Low reporting (PRISMA) quality Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality No registered or published protocol |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 8 |
| Summary of Findings | Out of a total of eight papers AMSTAR 2 rated five SRs as extremely low quality and three SRs as low quality. The items with the lowest compliance rates in AMSTAR 2 included an explanation of selection inlcuded study designs (12.5%), a prior protocol provided (50%), report on the sources of funding for included studies (0%), and provision of a list of excluded studies with justifications (25%). ROBIS graded three out of eight SRs as “high risk.” The PRISMA checklist showed that three of the eight SRs scored less than 20 (out of a maximum of 27). |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |