Comment on 'Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep quality in old adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis'

Ref ID 1037
First Author S. Lv
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Year Of Publishing 2024
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17131
Keywords Heterogeneity
Risk of bias
General medical
Searching
Problem(s) Flawed risk of bias undertaken
Insufficient literature searches
Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity
Number of systematic reviews included 1
Summary of Findings The letter authors highlighted the following issues: 1) They found an eligible study not included in the review. 1) The review authors did not accurately assess the risk of bias. 3) There were differences in the control group between studies but this heterogeneity was not emphasized.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?