An overview and methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery

Ref ID 128
First Author D. Chambers
Journal BMJ OPEN
Year Of Publishing 2014
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039862/pdf/bmjopen-2014-005014.pdf
Keywords Surgery
Overlapping reviews/redundancy
Problem(s) Redundant / overlapping / duplicated review question; leads to research waste
Number of systematic reviews included 10
Summary of Findings There was a high degree of overlap in the 10 published systematic reviews of enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing colorectal surgery with minor differences, indicating a high degree of research waste.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes