Extent and quality of systematic review evidence related to minimum intervention in dentistry: essential oils, powered toothbrushes, triclosan, xylitol

Ref ID 178
First Author S. Mickenautsch
Journal INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL
Year Of Publishing 2011
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21851349/
Keywords Dentistry
Error
Risk of bias
Problem(s) Errors in study inclusion or omission of relevant studies
Flawed risk of bias undertaken
Number of systematic reviews included 11
Summary of Findings Whilst the AMSTAR quality was good, none of the 11 included systematic reviews judged quality of the included trials to assess whether selection bias was present.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No