Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review

Ref ID 191
First Author H. Kamioka
Journal NUTRITION RESEARCH
Year Of Publishing 2017
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28473057/
Keywords Protocols
Nutrition
Publication bias
Risk of bias
Problem(s) No registered or published protocol
Poor consideration of publication bias
No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 49
Summary of Findings The quality of the systematic reviews of Foods with Function Claims was poor (mean AMSTAR ± SD; 6.2 ± 1.8 points, range; 2-11 points). In particular there was poor registration (2%), evaluation of publication bias (12%), and appropriate conclusions based on scientific quality of the included studies (27%).
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No