Are orthodontic systematic reviews registered a priori in PROSPERO?

Ref ID 232
First Author S. Sideri
Journal JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS
Year Of Publishing 2017
URL https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/149418/1/OA14_Papageorgiou.pdf
Keywords Protocols
Dentistry
Pre-specification
Problem(s) No registered or published protocol
Number of systematic reviews included 182
Summary of Findings From the 182 orthodontic published systematic reviews included, 20.3% were registered in PROSPERO, with registration rates ranging from 4.3% in 2012 to 37.0% in 2016.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No