The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high‐impact nursing journals: a review of the literature

Ref ID 237
First Author T. Pölkki
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Year Of Publishing 2014
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jocn.12132?download=true
Keywords • Nursing
• Low reporting quality
Problem(s) • Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Finland
Aim To assess the conduct of systematic review articles published in the top 10 nursing journals in 2009 and 2010.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings Of the 39 systematic review articles published in the top 10 nursing journals in 2009 and 2010, the method of synthesis was mentioned in only half of the reviews, the most common being narrative synthesis.
Number of systematic reviews included 39
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 178