- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
- The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high‐impact nursing journals: a review of the literature
| Ref ID | 237 |
| First Author | T. Pölkki |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING |
| Year Of Publishing | 2014 |
| URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jocn.12132?download=true |
| Keywords |
Nursing Low reporting quality |
| Problem(s) |
Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE) |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 39 |
| Summary of Findings | Of the 39 systematic review articles published in the top 10 nursing journals in 2009 and 2010, the method of synthesis was mentioned in only half of the reviews, the most common being narrative synthesis. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |