Ref ID |
260 |
First Author |
S. Chapman |
Journal |
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY |
Year Of Publishing |
2017 |
URL |
https://watermark.silverchair.com/bjs10423.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAArMwggKvBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKgMIICnAIBADCCApUGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMDZEEwTnrSubDSeOQAgEQgIICZsQwfMZSPNkJ2R4T8FAhtLFZyKCekuCeL0q_MncSn5OK5zY5mqrf-fmyo1A7YqA-YhIMVVhxmgfNC53ZcdS4hEDblEIJWAOpODZ5t3vYO7xkJQaLwGW7Mc0eeMS7GD-frG5T-WWDRZBQpF_uj5UwT0M2vTahXkGYfYA9ZsFMkWgJ1-5yhQyzdOx075opaaKCB596TA2AXRrXVqTWD5Akx4P4i-zoZQKI7yniTTOGbL6n3tBQ_4IOXwQalJlpJ1nmQ69_Hi2L_3jyiQckxcQ3LDs6KXS2qJ0H_UqLjkTz4T7czvro3Y1061utOwDqR3hlCdlXy3h9uUHuuebt9S8LLP4K6HhK24kieCFls3aUkIrSbdm8kqEp786F7poC9YyIEiO8Qh53zPOsr61MNqdzwp7Rt5Ese1RwL6D05zEaQJSf2KPzgIIIa6i44RLLsvCwXzrLSNUk72ztzSH3yIB30T1XnYJGBDNGk__4pPH_5Pey6DmGbMBgaW_Zio4C0LFvZFQuhC2oHJY3PqWYX12S-qKJ-pMFvdjgKNBH7uaT9uDJFYhiHJ2LtqAAlCo8s1fE1I7pUy4Mr_nHDUbWv44XrVFgM-2TPqFHeUWDFEw3LWeRwMP6EQk5iESdChB0vSWbu4cbwwE_kVofwXp0XljAt55c_tNmVE5xZYNuFXIM8tyk4sTJO-UqwXNrgTrxJyuyqd6rh7ea_1HVIodg4bhWlk8ysTzVKMyn-wuYJWu_2kOmwOr3k8UmYna4aSY1kWDZvlaMeOGn-pT5JksIulsVEbMR5UGeefusv5g2FZY7QFvmlV1jx9J3 |
Keywords |
Surgery |
Problem(s) |
Following guidelines is no guarantee of a rigorous systematic review |
Number of systematic reviews included |
281 |
Summary of Findings |
There was no meaningful change in median compliance with the PRISMA Statement before or after introduction of PRISMA. Overall methodological quality of systematic reviews increased after publication of the PRISMA Statement from a median AMSTAR score of 6 (i.q.r. range 4–7) to 8 (7–9) of 11 (P <0⋅001). Better reporting compliance (PRISMA) was associated with higher methodological quality (AMSTAR). |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? |
Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |
No |