- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
- Quality of the Evidence Supporting the Role of Oral Nutritional Supplements in the Management of Malnutrition: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
| Ref ID | 268 |
| First Author | C. Baldwin |
| Journal | ADV NUTR |
| Year Of Publishing | 2021 |
| URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32945835 |
| Keywords |
Heterogeneity Risk of bias Vitamins and supplements Searching |
| Problem(s) |
Insufficient literature searches Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 22 |
| Summary of Findings | From the 22 included systematic reviews, ten reviews were high quality (AMSTAR scores 8–11), 9 moderate (AMSTAR scores 3–8), and 3 poor quality (AMSTAR scores 0–3). Methodological deficiencies were limitations to searches, poor reporting of heterogeneity, and failure to incorporate quality of evidence into any recommendations. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |