Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview

Ref ID 312
First Author O. B. de Oliveira-Neto
Journal JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Year Of Publishing 2017
URL https://www.thejpd.org/article/S0022-3913(16)30455-3/fulltext
Keywords Protocols
Dentistry
Risk of bias
Low reporting quality
Searching
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) No registered or published protocol
No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Insufficient literature searches
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
Number of systematic reviews included 5
Summary of Findings Of the 5 included systematic reviews that evaluated the immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites published in multiple databases up to 2015, 3 were low methodological (AMSTAR) quality and 2 were assessed as moderate. The most common deficiencies were a priori protocol; comprehensive literature search; list of excluded studies; quality assessment; and quality assessment incorporated into conclusions.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes