- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
- Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: An overview
| Ref ID | 312 |
| First Author | O. B. de Oliveira-Neto |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY |
| Year Of Publishing | 2017 |
| URL | https://www.thejpd.org/article/S0022-3913(16)30455-3/fulltext |
| Keywords |
Protocols Dentistry Risk of bias Low reporting quality Searching Low methodological quality |
| Problem(s) |
No registered or published protocol No quality assessment undertaken or reported Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality Insufficient literature searches Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 5 |
| Summary of Findings | Of the 5 included systematic reviews that evaluated the immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites published in multiple databases up to 2015, 3 were low methodological (AMSTAR) quality and 2 were assessed as moderate. The most common deficiencies were a priori protocol; comprehensive literature search; list of excluded studies; quality assessment; and quality assessment incorporated into conclusions. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |