- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- No quality assessment undertaken or reported
- Assessment of methodological quality for included studies is necessary in a systematic review
Ref ID | 315 |
First Author | J. G. Zhao |
Journal | CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE |
Year Of Publishing | 2015 |
URL | http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/pages/default.aspx |
Keywords |
Surgery Risk of bias |
Problem(s) |
No quality assessment undertaken or reported |
Number of systematic reviews included | 1 |
Summary of Findings | The letter highlighting the conduct of one systematic review of the prevalence of bloodstream infection associated with arterial catheters states that no quality assessment was undertaken in this systematic review. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |