| Summary of Findings |
From 25 systematic reviews that included falsified data. One of 6 quantitative reviews which included Reuben reports would have reached different conclusions without Reuben reports. In all 6 (30 subgroup analyses involving Reuben reports), exclusion of Reuben reports never made any difference when the number of patients from Reuben reports was less than 30% of all patients included in the analysis. Of 8 qualitative reviews which included Reuben reports, all authors agreed that one would certainly have reached different conclusions without Reuben reports. For another 4, the authors’ judgment was not unanimous. |
