Equity issues were not fully addressed in Cochrane human immunodeficiency virus systematic reviews

Ref ID 392
First Author T. Aves
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2017
URL https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(16)30455-3/fulltext
Keywords • Immunology
• Cochrane
• Equity
Problem(s) • Failure to consider equity, different socioeconomic groups or disadvantaged populations
Article Type Empirical
Article Subtype Cross-sectional survey/Methodological systematic review
First Author Country Canada
Checklists • AMSTAR 1
• PROGRESS-plus
Aim To assess equity reporting in Cochrane systematic reviews of human immunodeficiency virus and explore the extent to which equity issues are addressed and reported in HIV reviews using the PROGRESS Plus framework.
Level of Investigation Descriptive
Summary of Findings The included HIV systematic reviews did not consistently addressed equity issues. Gender was most commonly mentioned (65%); followed by area income (55%); place of residence (24%); race (20%); occupation (11%); socio-economic status (11%); education (8%); sexual orientation (4%); religion (2%); age (2%); and social capital (1%).
Number of systematic reviews included 103
Number of eligible systematic reviews assessed 103
Treatment impacted No
Treatment impacted description
Interpretation impacted Not Applicable
Interpretation impacted description