Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies

Ref ID 402
First Author C. A. Naaktgeboren
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2014
URL https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(14)00229-7/fulltext
Keywords Diagnostic
Heterogeneity
Problem(s) Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity
Number of systematic reviews included 65
Summary of Findings Of the reviews that performed a meta-analysis, 25% did not formally investigate heterogeneity. Only 69% of reviews mentioned the exploration or the findings of exploration of sources of heterogeneity in the abstract or conclusion of the main text results. 18% of included reviews did not perform a meta-analysis due to heterogeneity.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes