- Framework of problems / Comprehensive
- Errors or omissions in search strategy
- Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency
Ref ID | 409 |
First Author | M. Sampson |
Journal | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Year Of Publishing | 2006 |
URL | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16980145/ |
Keywords |
Cochrane Error General medical Searching |
Problem(s) |
Errors or omissions in search strategy |
Number of systematic reviews included | 105 |
Summary of Findings | Most (90.5%) of the assessed search strategies contained at least one error. Errors that could potentially lower recall of relevant studies were found in 82.5% and inconsequential errors (to the evidence base) were found in 60.3% of the search strategies. The most common search errors were missed MeSH terms (44.4%), unwarranted explosion of MeSH terms (38.1%), and irrelevant MeSH or free text terms (28.6%). Missed spelling variants, combining MeSH and free text terms in the same line, and failure to tailor the search strategy for other databases occurred with equal frequency (20.6%). Logical operator error occurred in 19.0% of searches. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |