Intervention quality is not routinely assessed in Cochrane systematic reviews of radiation therapy interventions

Ref ID 479
First Author M. R. Abdul Rahim
Journal JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING & RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2017
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1754-9485.12589?download=true
Keywords Cochrane
Oncology
Low reporting quality
Problem(s) Weaknesses identified in some Cochrane reviews
Intervention not described / defined
Number of systematic reviews included 67
Summary of Findings Of the 67 Cochrane systematic reviews studied, only two mentioned quality assurance or quality control. The authors conclude that 97% of reviews failed to consider the quality assurance of the interventions in the included studies.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes