- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Multiplicity of outcomes and lack of pre-specification for outcome reporting
- A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation
Ref ID | 506 |
First Author | M. Paquette |
Journal | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS |
Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6814034/pdf/13643_2019_Article_1152.pdf |
Keywords |
Cochrane Multiplicity Cardiology Pre-specification |
Problem(s) |
Multiplicity of outcomes and lack of pre-specification for outcome reporting |
Number of systematic reviews included | 17 |
Summary of Findings | Most (76.5%) planned pre-specified subgroup analyses, of which 41.2% conducted subgroups. The credibility of subgroups performed was assessed and less than half (43%) represented one of a small number of pre-specified hypothesis and rarely were effects seen within studies (7%). No reviews included details on how covariates were selected, or if statistical considerations necessitated an abbreviated list of covariates from an initial set pre-specified for investigation. Of 5 reviews that reported subgroup effects, only 3 discussed subgroup effects as part of the overall conclusions. None discussed credibility of subgroup effects. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |