- Framework of problems / Objective
- Failure to consider equity, different socioeconomic groups or disadvantaged populations
- Sex/gender reporting and analysis in Campbell and Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional methods study
| Ref ID | 510 |
| First Author | J. Petkovic |
| Journal | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS |
| Year Of Publishing | 2018 |
| URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6090880/pdf/13643_2018_Article_778.pdf |
| Keywords |
Cochrane Campbell Equity General medical |
| Problem(s) |
Failure to consider equity, different socioeconomic groups or disadvantaged populations |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 688 |
| Summary of Findings | Results sections described sex/gender in 37% of Campbell reviews and 75% of Cochrane reviews. Methods sections included the highest reporting of sex/gender in both Campbell (50.8%) and Cochrane (83.1%) reviews. 62% of Campbell reviews and 86% of Cochrane reviews did not report sex/gender in the abstract but included sex/gender considerations in a later section. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |