Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?

Ref ID 513
First Author E. M. Beller
Journal SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Year Of Publishing 2013
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23714302/
Keywords Transparency
General medical
Low reporting quality
Searching
Currency
Problem(s) Outdated searches
Insufficient literature searches
Number of systematic reviews included 300
Summary of Findings 90% of included reviews provided the date of search in the full-text article.11.3% of searches in the included reviews were conducted on only one database. Another six 2.0% of articles did not mention how many databases had been searched.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No