| Ref ID |
527 |
| First Author |
T. A. McGrath |
| Journal |
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY |
| Year Of Publishing |
2020 |
| URL |
https://watermark.silverchair.com/hvaa093.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAsEwggK9BgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggKuMIICqgIBADCCAqMGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMhoGopop7KXOQ-AfOAgEQgIICdHbIbaHQOWgRbbI8K6jZDZ_QSD7aWI0-sZrJr0j2fA4KdadsCZN5_G95Ay_Ht537vmEERJHZGR2VFOwqR24qUM9t_RGhehQybGiPOIhPJJXxaIQIJrrkSVDiaATFTdpBK_XVjc494kKAU3bzhsEliDdgamdVP7_coTQqg9jDBMJZYs5gH7-4rCayLHBXX-en5ewnFk-vE1p1M5SI13oJRtBFCcTd276rrxiTndYnHXpwHyjQKpC0Z9oUFPp8eEmKcZfx19btHZggzy7I_RgR7eDrDcIKokp0ob7bU7qo0aauNCkj7yXe0-5al74sjbXpjqMcMpuGa9qPOP5-dzcJkr6CkmTk3ohFjJ4bXS0lHC1A1sed2uZujSsQUUHuoxzJtjhB8wq9pKMb4Iy5O36B6JhmEUS2YAc6iifd7kLmjV3jlroafZOXGaDks1xEnah3DCCOWOO4le44bUfzofi4maznz4tlJZwBuEvWPLl5n6skksA7qozfF3SJPKzWUWy6CmjNet7BuetX-jleURPdp2MuqHmNfXVNjOklQzRL_WvqH5IP-z20k7DqqCzRSCf8hjNCZsXDJvNswlHQwt2eunF38Ndu14qjnRf4rKS3we7vLTvplYbh7GgZtHS94iLpqCaV6xMsAbPDEBw7OMvWcZfl2SQrEh9Jia9p00CfSNIE_kXVXpp7LkOlgM_91WI36sZslXF_faFekE9IDM7M6x4_sk7qYZME1uIHqtDlutrALTsdfDFH2AvRSvps0wUAMEdEdf1MjsfKETHe4cEnRVFT7wRJvYDJWRq7dxPs_iVUFPQrmiouaMpffRjlLOiMe2_86rQ |
| Keywords |
Cochrane
Diagnostic
Spin
Non-Cochrane reviews
|
| Problem(s) |
Spin or subjective interpretation of findings
Cochrane reviews more rigorous/higher quality than non-Cochrane reviews
|
| Number of systematic reviews included |
137 |
| Summary of Findings |
At least one actual overinterpretation
practice was present in the abstract in 46% of included reviews and in the full-text report in 38% of included reviews. Reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were less likely to contain actual
overinterpretation in the abstract or the full-text report
than reviews in other high-impact journals |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? |
Yes |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |
Yes |
