Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID‐19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks

Ref ID 554
First Author Y. Yu
Journal JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2020
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32301508/
Keywords Expertise
COVID
Publication bias
Risk of bias
Disclosure
Low methodological quality
Single reviewer
Problem(s) Single reviewer / lack of double checking
Poor consideration of publication bias
Lack of statistical expertise in handling of quantitative data
No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Funding or sponsor of systematic review not reported
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 49
Summary of Findings Of the included reviews, 6, 12, and 31 systematic reviews were of moderate, low, and critically low quality, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the SR topic (P < .001), the involvement of a methodologist (P < .001), and funding support (P = .046) were significantly associated with the methodological quality of the systematic review
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes