- Framework of problems / Objective
- Lack of clinical expert/ stakeholder/ user perspective
- Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
Ref ID | 560 |
First Author | A. Pollock |
Journal | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS |
Year Of Publishing | 2018 |
URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6260873/pdf/13643_2018_Article_852.pdf |
Keywords |
Stakeholder General medical |
Problem(s) |
Lack of clinical expert/ stakeholder/ user perspective |
Number of systematic reviews included | 271 |
Summary of Findings | Reporting of who was involved, in what ways and at what stage in the review process was generally very poor, and the majority of the papers (59%) were judged to provide few details and/or an inadequate description of the method or approach of involving stakeholders. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |