Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review

Ref ID 560
First Author A. Pollock
Year Of Publishing 2018
Keywords Stakeholder
General medical
Problem(s) Lack of clinical expert/ stakeholder/ user perspective
Number of systematic reviews included 271
Summary of Findings Reporting of who was involved, in what ways and at what stage in the review process was generally very poor, and the majority of the papers (59%) were judged to provide few details and/or an inadequate description of the method or approach of involving stakeholders.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes