- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Flawed risk of bias undertaken
- Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials
Ref ID | 561 |
First Author | F. Wuytack |
Journal | SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS |
Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6323681/pdf/13643_2018_Article_924.pdf |
Keywords |
Cochrane Inference Risk of bias General medical |
Problem(s) |
Flawed risk of bias undertaken Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias |
Number of systematic reviews included | 100 |
Summary of Findings | Just under half of non-Cochrane reviews did not conduct a risk of bias assessment. Only one in ten non-Cochrane reviews reported the reasons for ascribing trials with high risk of bias for sequence generation |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |