Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews

Ref ID 562
First Author Z. Xinke
Journal SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Year Of Publishing 2016
URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072301/pdf/13643_2016_Article_353.pdf
Keywords Protocols
Grey literature
Complimentary & Alternative
Publication bias
Risk of bias
Disclosure
Low reporting quality
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Flawed risk of bias undertaken
Poor consideration of publication bias
Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing
No registered or published protocol
Grey literature excluded
Search strategy not provided
Individual study characteristics not reported sufficiently
Number of systematic reviews included 12
Summary of Findings Low AMSTAR quality was found across several domains including No registered or published protocol; Conflict of interest statement or disclosures for review authors missing; Grey literature excluded; Search strategy not provided; Individual study characteristics not reported sufficiently; Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality; Flawed risk of bias undertaken; Poor consideration of publication bias
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes