- Framework of problems / Objective
- Single reviewer / lack of double checking
- The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews
Ref ID | 623 |
First Author | C. R. Stoll |
Journal | RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS |
Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
URL | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31272125/ |
Keywords |
General medical Team Single reviewer |
Problem(s) |
Single reviewer / lack of double checking |
Number of systematic reviews included | 1 |
Summary of Findings | Within the context of the systematic review being performed, dual independent screening of all references led to a significantly greater identification of the relevant studies for inclusion than using dual screening only at full text stage, according to a chi squared test |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |