- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Following guidelines is no guarantee of a rigorous systematic review
- The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry
| Ref ID | 631 |
| First Author | C. M. Faggion Jr |
| Journal | THE VETERINARY JOURNAL |
| Year Of Publishing | 2012 |
| URL | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21924652/ |
| Keywords |
Grey literature Dentistry Animal studies Publication bias Risk of bias Low methodological quality |
| Problem(s) |
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality Grey literature excluded Poor execution of narrative synthesis Poor consideration of publication bias No quality assessment undertaken or reported Following guidelines is no guarantee of a rigorous systematic review |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 54 |
| Summary of Findings | Only two included reviews were regarded as high quality. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |