Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry

Ref ID 633
First Author C. M. Faggion
Journal JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
Year Of Publishing 2014
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jre.12092
Keywords Cochrane
Abstract / summary
Dentistry
Error
Low reporting quality
Non-Cochrane reviews
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries
Number of systematic reviews included 146
Summary of Findings Five of seven assessed criteria were met in less than 50% of the abstracts from 146 reviews.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes