- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
- Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry
Ref ID | 633 |
First Author | C. M. Faggion |
Journal | JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH |
Year Of Publishing | 2014 |
URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jre.12092 |
Keywords |
Cochrane Abstract / summary Dentistry Error Low reporting quality Non-Cochrane reviews Low methodological quality |
Problem(s) |
Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE) Errors in systematic review abstracts or plain language summaries |
Number of systematic reviews included | 146 |
Summary of Findings | Five of seven assessed criteria were met in less than 50% of the abstracts from 146 reviews. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |