- Framework of problems / Objective
- High risk of bias (ROBIS)
- Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis
| Ref ID | 634 |
| First Author | A. Hasuike |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH |
| Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
| URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jre.12638?download=true |
| Keywords |
Dentistry Observational studies Statistical Expertise Risk of bias Language Low methodological quality |
| Problem(s) |
Inclusion of observational / non-randomised studies Lack of statistical expertise in handling of quantitative data Flawed risk of bias undertaken Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality High risk of bias (ROBIS) Language restriction |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 23 |
| Summary of Findings | All of the included SRs, except one Cochrane review, had low methodological quality as assessed by AMSTAR 2 and high risk of bias as assessed by ROBIS. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |