Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis

Ref ID 634
First Author A. Hasuike
Journal JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
Year Of Publishing 2019
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jre.12638?download=true
Keywords Dentistry
Observational studies
Statistical
Expertise
Risk of bias
Language
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Inclusion of observational / non-randomised studies
Lack of statistical expertise in handling of quantitative data
Flawed risk of bias undertaken
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
High risk of bias (ROBIS)
Language restriction
Number of systematic reviews included 23
Summary of Findings All of the included SRs, except one Cochrane review, had low methodological quality as assessed by AMSTAR 2 and high risk of bias as assessed by ROBIS.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes