|JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
|Year Of Publishing
Risk of bias
Low methodological quality
Inclusion of observational / non-randomised studies
Lack of statistical expertise in handling of quantitative data
Flawed risk of bias undertaken
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
High risk of bias (ROBIS)
|Number of systematic reviews included
|Summary of Findings
|All of the included SRs, except one Cochrane review, had low methodological quality as assessed by AMSTAR 2 and high risk of bias as assessed by ROBIS.
|Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results?
|Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?