Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature

Ref ID 653
First Author J. J. Gagnier
Journal JBJS
Year Of Publishing 2013
URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23780547/
Keywords Protocols
Orthopaedic
Grey literature
Statistical
Expertise
Publication bias
Risk of bias
Low reporting quality
Low methodological quality
Single reviewer
Problem(s) No registered or published protocol
Grey literature excluded
Single reviewer / lack of double checking
Poor consideration of publication bias
Lack of statistical expertise in handling of quantitative data
Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
Low reporting (PRISMA) quality
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 76
Summary of Findings Both reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the top five orthopaedic journals were poor
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? No
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes