- Framework of problems / Comprehensive
- Not updated regularly
- How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews.
| Ref ID | 664 |
| First Author | A. Babic |
| Journal | RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS |
| Year Of Publishing | 2020 |
| URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jrsm.1451?casa_token=-i2gavm6xYcAAAAA%3AzeiLyVpbvZMYBQLQuB6SM3wdotcBGz5EgEV3gc3nmQSTfj30FWJNjuQsw9n8D-WivaoxccnTAmNLlnA |
| Keywords |
Cochrane General medical Currency |
| Problem(s) |
Not updated regularly Weaknesses identified in some Cochrane reviews |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 545 |
| Summary of Findings | Almost half of Cochrane reviews did not provide a sufficiently informative reason why the review was deemed to be stable and no in need of undate |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | No |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |