How to decide whether a systematic review is stable and not in need of updating: Analysis of Cochrane reviews.

Ref ID 664
First Author A. Babic
Journal RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS
Year Of Publishing 2020
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jrsm.1451?casa_token=-i2gavm6xYcAAAAA%3AzeiLyVpbvZMYBQLQuB6SM3wdotcBGz5EgEV3gc3nmQSTfj30FWJNjuQsw9n8D-WivaoxccnTAmNLlnA
Keywords Cochrane
General medical
Currency
Problem(s) Not updated regularly
Weaknesses identified in some Cochrane reviews
Number of systematic reviews included 545
Summary of Findings Almost half of Cochrane reviews did not provide a sufficiently informative reason why the review was deemed to be stable and no in need of undate
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? No
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes