Inadequate critical appraisal of studies in systematic reviews of time to diagnosis

Ref ID 694
First Author E. Launay
Journal JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Year Of Publishing 2016
URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.013
Keywords Diagnostic
Problem(s) Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias
Ignores setting or context of included studies which limits review applicability
Number of systematic reviews included 45
Summary of Findings Of the 45 included systematic reviews, only 51% reported a critical appraisal process. Overall 36% of all systematic reviews reported assessment of at least one item on risk of bias and/or threats to generalisability. Authors did not report how results of the critical appraisal were used in 23% of the SRs with critical appraisal.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes