- Framework of problems / Transparent
- Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
- A quality assessment of systematic reviews on telerehabilitation: what does the evidence tell us?
Ref ID | 710 |
First Author | M. Rogante |
Journal | ANNALI DELL'ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA |
Year Of Publishing | 2015 |
URL | https://dx.doi.org/10.4415/ANN_15_01_04 |
Keywords |
Grey literature Error Risk of bias Telemedicine Low reporting quality Low methodological quality |
Problem(s) |
Grey literature excluded Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality Errors in effect estimate calculations or data synthesis |
Number of systematic reviews included | 10 |
Summary of Findings | From the ten included systematic reviews on telerehabilitation, methodological quality using AMSTAR was commonly deficient including: analysis of grey literature; list of excluded studies; identification of possible risk of bias; appropriate method of synthesis. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |