|Year Of Publishing
Complimentary & Alternative
Low reporting quality
Not updated regularly
Intervention not described / defined
Unplanned or unjustified subgroup or sensitivity analyses
|Number of systematic reviews included
|Summary of Findings
|55% were published 5 years previously and had not been updated. 45.9% included a heterogeneous range of herbs and formulas. PRISMA quality was poor for for items 11 (defining all data items for extraction) and 23 (describing additional analyses).
|Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results?
|Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?