- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Data extraction errors and double counting
- Appraising the exercise oncology literature: a reminder of the rigour needed in systematic reviews
Ref ID | 743 |
First Author | S.Neil-Sztramko |
Journal | BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE |
Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
URL | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28341728/ |
Keywords |
Missing data Error Oncology Physiotherapy |
Problem(s) |
Errors in study inclusion or omission of relevant studies Data extraction errors and double counting |
Number of systematic reviews included | 1 |
Summary of Findings | The authors of the letter regarding one systematic review of the design of resistance training protocols for interventions in cancer survivors published in 2017 highlight double counting from inclusion of multiple articles reporting the results of the same study; omission of a relevant study and several other reporting errors. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? |