Cochrane systematic reviews on traditional Chinese medicine: What matters-the quantity or quality of evidence?

Ref ID 783
First Author Z. Dai
Journal PHYTOMEDICINE
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094471132100461X
Keywords Cochrane
Complimentary & Alternative
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Weaknesses identified in some Cochrane reviews
Number of systematic reviews included 104
Summary of Findings From 104 included systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to May 2021 on traditional Chinese medicine. According to AMSTAR 2, 51 (49.0%) Cochrane systematic reviews were of low quality.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No