- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity
- Comments on "the role of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation: Systematic review and meta-analysis"
Ref ID | 788 |
First Author | M.C. Chang |
Journal | KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN |
Year Of Publishing | 2022 |
URL | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355039153_Comments_on_The_role_of_percutaneous_neurolysis_in_lumbar_disc_herniation_systematic_review_and_meta-analysis |
Keywords |
Orthopaedic Surgery Heterogeneity Non-Cochrane reviews |
Problem(s) |
Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity Ignores setting or context of included studies which limits review applicability |
Number of systematic reviews included | 1 |
Summary of Findings | The letter to the editor highlights concern regarding the conduct of one systematic review of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation published in 2021, that studies included in the meta-analysis were not appropriately homogenous or representative of the target population for patients with chronic disc herniation. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |