Quality of systematic reviews in HIV: The case of clinical outcomes associated with patient medication adherence

Ref ID 822
First Author J. Lake
Journal JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
Year Of Publishing 2021
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12423?casa_token=Jz9BHTJGNwkAAAAA%3AWZT__ys56HNAyYdy4C60iz8G0dDnDC_eYt9roS-KfzQEmBbmtwF_EiXBCOAsoFZybEhzEuUHCqGWq27n
Keywords Pharmacological
Immunology
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 9
Summary of Findings Of the 9 included systematic reviews on HIV adherence and outcomes indexed in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed Central, the Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, Web of Science, ScIELO Citation Index, and Ovid Emcareoverall confidence in the results was critically low for most (78%) using AMSTAR 2.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes