- Framework of problems /
- Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
- Quality of systematic reviews in HIV: The case of clinical outcomes associated with patient medication adherence
Ref ID | 822 |
First Author | J. Lake |
Journal | JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE |
Year Of Publishing | 2021 |
URL | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jebm.12423?casa_token=Jz9BHTJGNwkAAAAA%3AWZT__ys56HNAyYdy4C60iz8G0dDnDC_eYt9roS-KfzQEmBbmtwF_EiXBCOAsoFZybEhzEuUHCqGWq27n |
Keywords |
Pharmacological Immunology Low methodological quality |
Problem(s) |
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality |
Number of systematic reviews included | 9 |
Summary of Findings | Of the 9 included systematic reviews on HIV adherence and outcomes indexed in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed Central, the Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, Web of Science, ScIELO Citation Index, and Ovid Emcareoverall confidence in the results was critically low for most (78%) using AMSTAR 2. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |