- Framework of problems / Rigourous
- Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
- Quality, methods, and recommendations of systematic reviews on measures of evidence-based practice: an umbrella review
Ref ID | 823 |
First Author | J. Roberge-Dao |
Journal | JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS |
Year Of Publishing | 2022 |
URL | https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Abstract/2022/04000/Quality,_methods,_and_recommendations_of.6.aspx?context=FeaturedArticles&collectionId=2 |
Keywords |
Protocols General medical Low reporting quality Non-Cochrane reviews Low methodological quality |
Problem(s) |
No quality assessment undertaken or reported Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE) No registered or published protocol |
Number of systematic reviews included | 10 |
Summary of Findings | From 10 included systematic reviews on evidence-based practice measures across health care professions indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC up to January 18, 2021, the overall quality of the systematic reviews was low. None of the reviews assessed the quality of primary studies or adhered to methodological guidelines, and only one registered a protocol. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |