Quality, methods, and recommendations of systematic reviews on measures of evidence-based practice: an umbrella review

Ref ID 823
First Author J. Roberge-Dao
Journal JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Abstract/2022/04000/Quality,_methods,_and_recommendations_of.6.aspx?context=FeaturedArticles&collectionId=2
Keywords Protocols
General medical
Low reporting quality
Non-Cochrane reviews
Low methodological quality
Problem(s) No quality assessment undertaken or reported
Low reporting or methodological quality (OTHER GUIDANCE)
No registered or published protocol
Number of systematic reviews included 10
Summary of Findings From 10 included systematic reviews on evidence-based practice measures across health care professions indexed in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC up to January 18, 2021, the overall quality of the systematic reviews was low. None of the reviews assessed the quality of primary studies or adhered to methodological guidelines, and only one registered a protocol.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? No