Methodological appraisal of the evidence about efficacy of metabolic surgery in adults with non-morbid obesity and hypertension: An overview of systematic reviews

Ref ID 850
First Author M.E. Caceres-Tavara
Journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919122004939?via%3Dihub
Keywords Surgery
Endocrinology
Disclosure
Low reporting quality
Low methodological quality
Single reviewer
Problem(s) Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Funding or sponsor of systematic review not reported
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
Single reviewer / lack of double checking
Number of systematic reviews included 3
Summary of Findings From 3 systematic reviews of the efficacy of metabolic surgery in adult patients with hypertension and non-morbid obesity indexed across PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2020. The methodological quality (AMSTAR 2) in all 3 included systematic reviews was critically low. Only 1 review performed dual data extraction; none of the reviews provided a list of excluded studies with rationale or provided details of funding.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes