Striving for Happily Ever After: Supportive Interventions for Youth Leaving Residential Placement. A Systematic Review of Reviews

Ref ID 881
First Author L.S. Kvamme
Journal CHILD & ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12507
Keywords Protocols
Risk of bias
Pre-specification
Disclosure
Social care
Low reporting quality
Low methodological quality
Single reviewer
Problem(s) Single reviewer / lack of double checking
Reasons for excluding potentially eligible studies not provided
Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
Limited quality assessment or no risk of bias
Risk of bias not incorporated into conclusions of review
No registered or published protocol
Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
Number of systematic reviews included 8
Summary of Findings From 8 systematic reviews of interventions for youth transitioning from Residential Placement indexed across nine bibliographic databases up to Feb 13 2019. Five of the eight systematic reviews were rated ‘critically low’ methodological quality (AMSTAR 2) and two systematic reviews were rated ‘low quality’. Common methodological quality deviations included: no clear statement that review methods were established before the authors conducted their literature search, study selection was not performed in duplicate, data extraction was not performed in duplicate, lists of excluded studies were not provided, and risk of bias was not completed.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes