A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264]

Ref ID 906
First Author S. Sahebi
Journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919122005337?via%3Dihub
Keywords Reproducibility
Surgery
Publication bias
Heterogeneity
Nephrology
Searching
Non-Cochrane reviews
Problem(s) Inadequate analysis of heterogeneity
Poor consideration of publication bias
Search strategy not provided
Methods not described to enable replication
Number of systematic reviews included 1
Summary of Findings From a letter highlighting some problems in the conduct of a systematic review on robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients published in 2022. The letter authors highlight that the systematic review did not report details of any limits used in the search strategies, and they did not follow Cochrane guidance on the assessment of heterogeneity, or publication bias.
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? Not Applicable
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study?