Prevention of demineralization during multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment: An overview of systematic reviews

Ref ID 908
First Author D. Sardana
Journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
Year Of Publishing 2022
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ipd.12927
Keywords • Pre-specification
• Disclosure
• Low reporting quality
• Dentistry
• Protocols
Problem(s) • Lack of prespecification in eligibility criteria
• Conflicts of interest or funding of included studies not assessed
• Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality
• No registered or published protocol
Number of systematic reviews included 29
Summary of Findings From 29 included systematic reviews for prevention of enamel demineralization during multi-bracketed fixed orthodontic treatment indexed across Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane database (only reviews), MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Web of Science, and Joanna Briggs Institute EBP (evidence-based practice) database on April 22 2020. 23 out of 29 reviews (79.3%) were assessed to be of a high risk of overall bias. The methodological quality (AMSTAR-2) items that were least reported were protocol registration and deviation (58.6%), explanation of the selection of study design (89.6%) and sources of funding of included studies (75.8%).
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? N/A
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? Yes