- Framework of problems / Transparent
- No registered or published protocol
- Determining the Completeness of Registration and Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Yoga for Health
| Ref ID | 938 |
| First Author | K. Bethel |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE |
| Year Of Publishing | 2023 |
| URL | https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jicm.2022.0785 |
| Keywords |
• Pre-specification • Complimentary & Alternative • Transparency • Protocols |
| Problem(s) |
• No registered or published protocol |
| Number of systematic reviews included | 147 |
| Summary of Findings | From 147 included systematic reviews identified from a larger sample of 322 meta-research projects on the use of yoga for health. Most reviews (116/147; 79%) did not mention the existence of either a protocol or registration. Some reviews mentioned a protocol without providing a link or other means of access (16/147)., or mentioned registration and provided a citation to a publication (1/147) or mentioned registration and provided a PROSPERO registration number (14/147). Only 10% of reviews provided access to a protocol overall (10%). Most included reviews published in2010 or later (97/139) cited PRISMA guidance but the relationship between mentioning or citing PRISMA and providing an accessible protocol or registration was not statistically significant. |
| Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | N/A |
| Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |