- Framework of problems / Comprehensive
- Language restriction
- The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews
Ref ID | 94 |
First Author | D. Moher |
Journal | HEALTH TECHNOL ASSESS |
Year Of Publishing | 2003 |
URL | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14670218/ |
Keywords |
Complimentary & Alternative Language |
Problem(s) |
Language restriction |
Number of systematic reviews included | 130 |
Summary of Findings | Language restrictions did not appear to bias the estimates of a conventional intervention’s effectiveness but did affect the results of a complimentary and alternative systematic review. If languages other than English reports were excluded this resulted in a reduced intervention effect, 63% on average (difference in the ratio of odds ratios of intervention = 1.63; 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 2.60). |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Yes |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | Yes |