- Framework of problems / Comprehensive
- Poor consideration of publication bias
- The quality of systematic reviews addressing peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction
Ref ID | 210 |
First Author | B. J. Sun |
Journal | JOURNAL OF PLASTIC, RECONSTRUCTIVE & AESTHETIC SURGERY: JPRAS |
Year Of Publishing | 2019 |
URL | https://www.jprasurg.com/article/S1748-6815(18)30423-6/fulltext |
Keywords |
Surgery Grey literature Publication bias |
Problem(s) |
Grey literature excluded Poor consideration of publication bias Low methodological (AMSTAR) quality |
Number of systematic reviews included | 26 |
Summary of Findings | The overall median AMSTAR score for the 26 included systematic reviews addressing peripheral nerve repair was 5, reflecting a “fair” quality. There was no evidence of AMSTAR score improvement over time. The largest areas of deficiency included using publication status (e.g. grey literature) as inclusion criteria ( n = 7), and assessing for publication bias ( n = 8). |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |