Poor consideration of publication bias

Articles that support this problem:

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016 : Plos medicine

Methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2012

2015 : The journal of urology

Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008

2010 : The journal of urology

The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality

2017 : Bju international

Quality of urological systematic reviews registered in PROSPERO

2019 : Bju international

Low Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature (2016-2018)

2020 : Urology

Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics

2019 : Journal of dentistry

Methodological quality and reporting of systematic reviews in hand and wrist pathology

2017 : Journal of hand surgery (european volume)

Reporting of sources of funding in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry

2014 : British dental journal

Variable methodological quality and use found in systematic reviews referenced in STEMI clinical practice guidelines

2017 : The american journal of emergency medicine

Statistical controversies in clinical research: publication bias evaluations are not routinely conducted in clinical oncology systematic reviews

2017 : Annals of oncology

The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study

2020 : Heliyon

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review

2017 : Cancer epidemiology

An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)

2011 : Journal of applied oral science

Identification and impact of outcome selection bias in meta‐analysis

2005 : Statistics in medicine

Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

2015 : Statistics in medicine

Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation

2013 : Physical therapy

DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a methodology overview of systematic reviews

2019 : Acta diabetologica

Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study

2018 : Epidemiology & psychiatric science

Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool

2015 : Npj primary care respiratory medicine

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

2018 : Bmc med res methodol

Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals

2015 : Nursing outlook

Quality Assessment of Systematic Review of the Bariatric Surgery for Diabetes Mellitus

2019 : Journal of diabetes research

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

2010 : Bmc pediatrics

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies

2012 : Human reproduction

The currency, completeness and quality of systematic reviews of acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A comprehensive evidence map

2018 : Plos one [electronic resource]

Methodological quality of systematic reviews and clinical trials on women's health published in a Brazilian evidence-based health journal

2013 : Clinics

Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency

2019 : Nutrients

Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review

2017 : Nutrition research

The quality of systematic reviews addressing peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction

2019 : Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: jpras

The quality of systematic reviews of effectiveness in literacy learning in English: a ‘tertiary’review

2007 : Journal of research in reading

Prostate Artery Embolisation: Poor Design and Reporting Impact the Value of Current Systematic Reviews

2018 : European urology

Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics

2011 : Orthodontics & craniofacial research

Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding the effectiveness of zygomatic implants: an overview of systematic reviews

2020 : Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal

Systematic reviews in burns care: poor quality and getting worse

2017 : Journal of burn care & research

Quality assessment of systematic reviews of vitamin D, cognition and dementia

2018 : Bjpsych open

Overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews on exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional analysis using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tool

2020 : Brazilian journal of physical therapy

Journal impact factor is associated with PRISMA endorsement, but not with the methodological quality of low back pain systematic reviews: a methodological review

2020 : European spine journal

Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic‐related systematic reviews

2013 : Journal of oral rehabilitation

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans

2013 : Journal of periodontology

Systematic Reviews in Craniofacial Trauma—Strengths and Weaknesses

2016 : Annals of plastic surgery

A review of methodological quality of systematic reviews on multiple pregnancies

2006 : Journal of obstetrics & gynaecology

Potential Problems With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

2017 : Journal of pain

P value-driven methods were underpowered to detect publication bias: analysis of Cochrane review meta-analyses

2020 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias

2013 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study

2014 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias

2005 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Non-communicable diseases research output in the Eastern Mediterranean region: an overview of systematic reviews

2020 : Bmc medical research methodology

Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews

2018 : Bmc medical research methodology

The case of the misleading funnel plot

2006 : Bmj

Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review

2016 : Evidence based library and information practice

Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews on the Efficacy of Oral Appliance Therapy for Adult and Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing

2016 : Journal of clinical sleep medicine

Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar ridge preservation

2013 : Journal of the american dental association

The association between periodontitis and coronary heart disease: a quality assessment of systematic reviews

2013 : Journal of the american dental association

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality

2017 : Systematic reviews

The magnitude of small-study effects in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an empirical study of nearly 30 000 meta-analyses

2020 : Bmj evidence-based medicine

Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID‐19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks

2020 : Journal of medical virology

Dissemination bias in systematic reviews of animal research: a systematic review

2014 : Plos one

Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study

2020 : Plos one

Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews

2016 : Systematic reviews

Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals

2011 : Plos one

Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews

2011 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

The methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological cancer pain management

2015 : Pain management nursing

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss

2013 : Journal of clinical periodontology

The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry

2012 : The veterinary journal

The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey

2007 : Cmaj

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature

2013 : Jbjs

Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey

2019 : Journal of clinical epidemiology

Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey

2007 : Reproductive health

Methodological Assessment in a Systematic Review for Anal Human Papillomavirus among Men

2019 : Journal of infectious diseases

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 : Annals of the american thoracic society

Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit

2017 : Bmj open

Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study

2021 : Frontiers in medicine

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview

2020 : Bmc complementary medicine and therapies

The effectiveness of adjunctive measures in managing peri-implant mucositis: an umbrella review

2022 : International journal of implant dentistry

Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer

2022 : Laryngoscope

Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain

2023 : Neural plasticity

A Call for Improving Research on Pain Neuroscience Education and Chronic Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

2023 : Journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy

Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

2022 : Journal of medical internet research

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool

2022 : Evidence based dentistry

Comment on "Ticks infected with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV): A decision approach systematic review and meta-analysis regarding their role as vectors"

2023 : Travel medicine and infectious disease

A commentary on "Robot-assisted kidney transplantation as a minimally invasive approach for kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analyses" [Int. J. Surg. 99 (2022) 106264]

2022 : International journal of surgery

Trends in systematic reviews of kidney transplantation: A 10-year analysis of the evidence base

2023 : Transplantation reviews

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for polycystic ovary syndrome: An overview of systematic reviews

2023 : The journal of integrative medicine

An Overview of Systematic Reviews: Acupuncture in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension

2022 : International journal of general medicine

Is data missing? An assessment of publication bias in orthodontic systematic reviews from 2010 to 2021

2022 : European journal of orthodontics