- Framework of problems / Comprehensive
- Poor consideration of publication bias
- The quality of systematic reviews of effectiveness in literacy learning in English: a ‘tertiary’review
Ref ID | 216 |
First Author | C. J. Torgerson |
Journal | JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING |
Year Of Publishing | 2007 |
URL | https://pure.york.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/the-quality-of-systematic-reviews-of-effectiveness-in-literacy-learning-in-english(195c8cb6-6fda-493a-8a51-2be9bb9e1c2a)/export.html |
Keywords |
Publication bias Education |
Problem(s) |
Poor consideration of publication bias |
Number of systematic reviews included | 14 |
Summary of Findings | Six of the 14 included systematic reviews (43%) of literacy learning published between 1983 and 2003 did not make an assessment of publication bias. |
Did the article find that the problem(s) led to qualitative changes in interpretation of the results? | Not Applicable |
Are the methods of the article described in enough detail to replicate the study? | No |